Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 12:00

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Man Killed by Police After Spiraling Into ChatGPT-Driven Psychosis - futurism.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Kobo’s Libra Colour and Elipsa 2E e-readers have dropped to some of their best prices - The Verge
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How does the brain decide "what" thought to attach to a feeling?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Which bands became massively popular for covering songs rather than recording originals?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Brad Pitt and Tim Cook surprise fans at Apple Fifth Avenue ahead of ‘F1 The Movie’ release - 9to5Mac
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Men’s College World Series 2025 Preview – Part 2 - Uni Watch